Page 57 - ATZ WORLDWIDE
P. 57

MiL/SiL      HiL          ViL          Test drive   Road           CONCLUSION

                                                                                By implementing the vehicle-in-the-loop
                                                                                approach, IAV adds virtual scenarios to
                                                                                real-world vehicle testing. Accordingly,
                                                                                the landscape of simulation-based test
                                                                                environments is not being extended by
                                                                          Effort  a further real-world component that is
             Simulation
                                                                                the test vehicle. Instead, it broadens the
            FIGURE 5 Vehicle-in-the-loop (ViL) as a bridge between simulation-based test methods and real-world test     possibilities of real-world vehicle tests
            drives (© IAV)                                                      by superimposing virtual scenarios,
                                                                                placing the focus on validating driver
                                                                                assistance functions – both in the
                                                                                early as well as in the late phases of
            acteristic properties. This makes it pos-  warning, emergency braking as well as   the development process.
            sible to test the function in conjunction   belt tensioning and closing the vehicle   In this context, the testing approach
            with the actuators but detached from   contour) is made for experience on a   presented will unfurl its full potential
            the sensors.                      real-world basis in the vehicle and can   above all in highly automated driving
              The test method presented also per-  be evaluated in relation to the particular   when the task of driving is assumed
            mits validation of subsequent sensor   driving situation.           by the vehicle, the driver merely sits
            data fusion at object level by varying the   One major advantage in testing is the   in the vehicle as back-up and, from
            position of an object recorded by the   ability to investigate even complex sce-  this position, can observe and evalu-
            camera and feeding it in on a virtual   narios without spatial limitations and   ate the virtually generated critical
            basis via the path of a further sensor. In   without additional target objects and test     driving situation and vehicle’s real
            addition to this, the ViL approach can be   equipment (such as steering and braking   response. In future, it would also be
            used for assisting the in-vehicle calibra-  robots or mobile systems for pedestrian     conceivable to use the test methodol-
            tion of driver assistance functions. For   and cyclist tests) in a very short time    ogy for driving on the road that is for
            highly automated vehicles, this would   and without the need for additional   validating functions in the field.
            even make it conceivable to calibrate     personnel to operate the test systems.
            functions automatically.          In addition, test scenarios, which have   REFERENCES
                                              been classed as too dangerous using   [1]  Bengler, K.; Dietmayer, K.; Färber, B.; Maurer,
                                              real-world target objects and therefore   M.; Stiller, C.; Winner, H.: Three decades of driver
            INITIAL RESULTS AND EVALUATION                                      assistance systems: Review and future perspec-
                                              not possible, can be run without any   tives. In: IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems
            At the moment, the vehicle-in-the-loop   risk to test drivers. In particular, these   Magazine 6 (2014), No. 4, pp. 6-22
            approach is used for validating warning,   include collision scenarios at high   [2] Winner, H.: Challenges of Automotive Systems
            emergency braking and pre-crash func-    relative speeds. These results show   Engineering for Industry and Academia. In: Maurer,
                                                                                M.; Winner, H. (Ed.): Automotive Systems Engineer-
            tions at high speeds. By superimposing   that the test method is ready for use   ing. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2013,
            virtual scenarios, critical driving situa-  and permits the resource-friendly,   pp. 3-15
            tions involving head-on, rear-end and   safe and reproducible testing of rele-  [3] Seiniger, P.; Weitzel, A.: Testverfahren für Ver-
            side collisions have been generated. The   vant  driving scenarios which, with   braucherschutz und Gesetzgebung. In: Winner, H.;
                                                                                Hakuli, S.; Lotz, F.; Singer, C. (Ed.): Handbuch
            entire cascade of anticipated vehicle   real  target objects, cannot be done or     Fahrerassistenzsysteme. Berlin/Heidelberg:
            responses (including visual-acoustic   only done to a very limited extent.  Springer-Verlag, 2015, pp. 167-182



            Stationary/moving target,
            relative velocity > 60 km/h       Oncoming traffic                    Bicycle suddenly cutting in








            Multi-object scenario             Dangerous overtaking               Dynamic emergency steering

                                                                                                  !
                                                                                                  !


            FIGURE 6 Driving situations which, with real-world target objects, cannot be tested or only to a limited
            extent (© IAV)
            ATZ worldwide  09|2017                                                                           55
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62