Page 71 - ATZ WORLDWIDE
P. 71

1  MOTIVATION                                      2 PRINCIPLES OF METHOLOGY
            2  PRINCIPLES OF METHOLOGY
            3  OPTIMAL ICE AND FC OPERATION                    All hybrid drives, both with an Internal Combustion Engine (ICE)
            4  BOOSTING AND RECUPERATION                       and a Fuel Cell (FC), can be described by the following basic hybrid
            5  OPTIMAL LOAD DECREASE AND INCREASE              modes: ICE or FC operation, boosting, recuperation, load point
            6  POTENTIALS OF HYBRID MODES                      decrease and load point increase. For a global optimal energetic
            7  POTENTIALS OF PREDICTIVE CONTROL STRATEGIES     operation, these hybrid modes can be partially optimised and cal-
            8  SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK                             culated in a specific order. As a result, a global optimal control
                                                               strategy for the considered hybrid vehicle is calculated [1].


                                                               3 OPTIMAL ICE AND FC OPERATION
                                                               The optimal ICE or FC operation represents the conventional oper-
                                                               ation of a hybrid drive, since the hybrid modes recuperation and
                                                               load point decrease are omitted initially. However, the hybrid mode
                                                               load point increase is an exception since it cannot be avoided for
                                                               certain drivetrain concepts, usually during the launch process.
                                                               Moreover, in this phase it is also necessary for the supply of the
                                                               auxiliary consumers. In general, the optimal ICE or FC operation
            1 MOTIVATION                                       is achieved through minimising the power of the fuel tank P Tank  in
                                                               every time step of the driving cycle which is considered in Eq. 1.
            The electrification of the powertrain has resulted in a large num-  In this case, all losses in the drivetrain are taken into account:
            ber of hybrid drive concepts. In particular, new hybrid drives using
            a Dedicated Hybrid Transmission (DHT) provide a promising   Eq. 1  min(P Tank ), P Bat  ≤ 0
            approach to further optimise the drive train characteristics in terms
            of efficiency, package requirements and costs. Because of this   An ICE is optimally operated, if the transmission can provide the
            diversity, the operation strategy approach has to be applicable to   optimal transmission ratio for every driving situation. In the ideal-
            any topologies and hybrid concepts. At the same time, an optimum   ised case, the ICE is operated along its best efficiency curve (η ICE,opt
            consumption has to be calculated for each concept to ensure that   curve), the efficiency of the ICE η ICE  is a function of the mechanical
            the comparison is based solely on the design of the topology and   ICE power P ICE . This is shown as an example in FIGURE 1 (left). By
            the aggregates.                                    applying Eq. 2
              Dynamic Programming (DP) is a known procedure to reliably
            identify the global energy optimum of a hybrid drive. However, the   Eq. 2  P Tank  = P ICE  / η ICE
            computational effort is relatively high because of the mathemati-
            cally universal approach which can also be applied to other prob-  the fuel tank power P Tank  depending on the mechanical ICE power
            lems. As a consequence, DP can only be used to a limited extent   P ICE  can be illustrated in FIGURE 1 (right).
            with regard to extensive concept studies. For this reason, a new   The efficiency of a FC is not dependent on a transmission, since
            Global Optimal Control Strategy (GOCS) was developed, which is   the FC provides electrical power. For operation with a constant
            based on energetic correlations of the hybrid drivetrain, and there-  current-voltage curve, FIGURE 2 (left) shows the efficiency of a FC
            fore does require less computational time. In addition, the devel-  η FC  depending on the FC power P FC . Analogous to the ICE, the fuel
            oped system of the operation strategy allows a detailed analysis   tank power P Tank  can be shown as a function of the electrical FC
            with regard to the potentials of hybrid modes [1].  power P FC  in FIGURE 2 (right).





                                         70                                 350
                                         60                                 300
                                                        η ICE,opt  curve    250
                                        ICE efficiency η ICE  [%]  40       Tank power P Tank  [kW]  200  η ICE,opt  curve  ∆P
                                         50


                                         30
                                                                            150
                                         20
                                         10                                 100            ∆P ICE    Tank
                                                                             50
            FIGURE 1 ICE efficiency (left)    0
            and fuel tank power (right)     0    20   40    60    80  100     0 0   20    40   60    80  100
            depending on ICE power for the
            efficiency-optimised operation           ICE power P  [kW]                  ICE power P  [kW]
                                                            ICE
                                                                                               ICE
            (© TU Braunschweig)
            ATZ worldwide  09|2017                                                                           69
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76